An on-line CORDIC based 2-D IDCT implementation using distributed arithmetic
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper presents a cost-effective VLSI architecture for a two-dimensional (2-D) inverse discrete cosine transform (IDCT) core based on a modified on-line CORDIC algorithm. In order to have a low hardware complexity and to provide a good performance, the proposed design is based on the row-column decomposition approach and distributed arithmetic (DA). By reformulating the 1-D IDCT functions using the CORDIC approach, the proposed design requires about 60% less ROM than the conventional DA-based IDCT without using CORDIC. In our architecture the on-line algorithm is used to further reduce the area and to enhance the computation speed. The core operates on blocks of 8/spl times/8 pixels, with 12-bit and 8-bit precision for inputs and outputs, respectively. The proposed design has been synthesized by using 0.35-/spl mu/m CMOS technology. The simulation results show that the core for IDCT can run at 150 MHz with 60 Mpixel/s throughput, while meeting the requirement of the H.26x standard.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".