MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2154661284 · doi:10.1080/00218460701377388

Digital In-Line Holography as a Three-Dimensional Tool to Study Motile Marine Organisms During Their Exploration of Surfaces

2007· article· en· W2154661284 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Matthias Heydt, Axel Rosenhahn, M. Grunze, Michala E. Pettitt, Maureen E. Callow, J. A. Callow

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Adhesion · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicDigital Holography and Microscopy
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersDalhousie University
KeywordsZoosporeSporeHolographyOceanographyMaterials scienceOpticsBiologyGeologyPhysicsBotany

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The swimming patterns of zoospores of the green alga Ulva linza in the vicinity of a surface were investigated by digital in-line holography. Full 3D motion patterns were retrieved from measurements and the traces obtained were compared with known swimming patterns of spores of the brown alga Hincksia irregularis and the green alga Ulva linza as seen in a conventional optical microscope. Quantitative information such as swimming velocity was calculated from the 3D traces. The results demonstrate the potential of digital in-line holography to image and quantify exploratory patterns of behavior of motile spores close to surfaces. This technique can give detailed insight into mechanisms of surface colonization by spores and larvae of fouling organisms in response to changes in surface properties.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations70
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of AdhesionSame topicDigital Holography and MicroscopyFrench-language works237,207