MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2154684942 · doi:10.1109/lpt.2009.2020685

A Frequency-Doubling Optoelectronic Oscillator Using a Polarization Modulator

2009· article· en· W2154684942 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Photonics Technology Letters · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Photonic Communication Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolarizerPhysicsLocal oscillatorMicrowaveOpticsRadio frequencyElectro-optic modulatorOptical filterOptoelectronicsPolarization (electrochemistry)Phase noiseIntermediate frequencyNarrowbandPhase modulationOptical modulatorComputer scienceTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A novel realization of a frequency-doubling optoelectronic oscillator (OEO) using a polarization modulator (PolM) is proposed and experimentally demonstrated. In the proposed system, the PolM in combination with two optical polarizers connected via two polarization controllers (PCs) is operating as a two-output intensity modulator. One output of the intensity modulator is connected to the radio-frequency port of the PolM, to form an optoelectronic loop for the generation of a microwave signal with the fundamental frequency determined by the center frequency of a narrowband electronic filter. The other output of the intensity modulator provides a fundamental or frequency-doubled optically modulated microwave signal depending on the static phase term introduced by the PC before the polarizer. The proposed OEO is experimentally demonstrated. A fundamental microwave signal at 10 GHz or a frequency-doubled microwave signal at 20 GHz is generated. The phase noise performance of the generated microwave signal is also investigated.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.534
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it