MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2155018430 · doi:10.1109/robio.2009.5420704

Cost-effective active localization technique for mobile robots

2009· article· en· W2155018430 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRobotics and Sensor-Based Localization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMonte Carlo localizationMobile robotParticle filterRobotComputer scienceInitializationArtificial intelligenceComputer visionMonte Carlo methodReduction (mathematics)Robot kinematicsPosition (finance)Simultaneous localization and mappingKalman filterMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Mobile robot localization is the problem of determining the position of a mobile robot from sensor data. Active localization provides setting the robot's motion direction and determining the pointing direction of the sensors during localization so as to most efficiently localize the robot. This paper proposes an active localization approach that employs Monte Carlo Localization, which is based on particle filters. The technique offers two main advantages. 1) The framework applies a different way of initializing the particles that helps to reduce some steps of localization, and 2) a new resampling scheme is used to reduce the cost of localization and solve the kidnapped robot problem. Experimental results show that the probability of robot successfully localize itself is considerably high, i.e. robot can recover from failure and localize itself based on new sensor data and reduction of cost is noticeable.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.987
Threshold uncertainty score0.455

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicRobotics and Sensor-Based LocalizationFrench-language works237,207