MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2155540130 · doi:10.1109/epec.2009.5420915

Modified artificial bee colony algorithm for optimal distributed generation sizing and allocation in distribution systems

2009· article· en· W2155540130 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOptimal Power Flow Distribution
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtificial bee colony algorithmSizingConvergence (economics)Computer scienceAlgorithmMathematical optimizationPower lossHeuristicPopulationBees algorithmPower (physics)MetaheuristicMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a modification in the neighboring search of the artificial bee colony (ABC) algorithm. The ABC algorithm is a new meta-heuristic population-based optimization technique inspired by the intelligent foraging behavior of honeybee swarms. To verify the validity of the proposed modified ABC algorithm, the problem of determining the optimal size, location and power factor for a distributed generation (DG) to minimize total system real power loss is considered. The IEEE 33-bus and 69-bus feeder systems are examined, and the results obtained by the proposed algorithm are compared with those found using other methods. The outcomes verify that the modified ABC algorithm has excellent solution quality and convergence characteristics. The efficiency of the proposed algorithm lies in the fact that the standard deviation of the attained results for 30 independent runs at every test case is virtually equal to zero.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.751
Threshold uncertainty score0.815

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations38
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicOptimal Power Flow DistributionFrench-language works237,207