MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2155903681 · doi:10.1353/lan.2004.0194

<b>Perspectives on English as a world language.</b> Ed. by David John Allerton, Paul Skandera, and Tschichold Cornelia. (International Cooper series in English language and literature 6.) Basel: Schwabe AG, 2002. Pp. xiv. 175. ISBN 3796517404. €33.50.

2004· article· en· W2155903681 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueLanguage · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicLinguistics, Language Diversity, and Identity
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhonologyLinguisticsScotsAustralian EnglishHistoryGrammarVariety (cybernetics)LexisVocabularyLexiconComputer scienceArtificial intelligencePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Perspectives on English as a world language ed. by David John Allerton, Paul Skandera, Cornelia Tschichold Richard W. Hallett Perspectives on English as a world language. Ed. by David John Allerton, Paul Skandera, and Cornelia Tschichold. (International Cooper series in English language and literature 6.) Basel: Schwabe AG, 2002. Pp. xiv, 175. ISBN 3796517404. €33.50. With the goal of presenting various case studies of how English is used around the world, the editors of this volume included selected papers from the 1999 meeting of the Joint Advanced Studies Group in Linguistics along with other invited contributions. [End Page 873] The first five chapters of the book concern native varieties of English. In Ch. 1, ‘Scottish English: A hybrid between Scots and Southern British English’ (1–13), Martina Häcker presents a brief history of Scottish English and discusses its phonology, vocabulary, grammar, status, and future. In Ch. 2, ‘RP and general American: A parting of the ways’ (15–29), Patricia Buccellato focuses on the phonological differences between the prestige varieties in the UK and the US. Brigitte Halford offers an overview of the phonology, vocabulary, syntax, and morphology of Canadian English in Ch. 3, ‘Canadian English: Distinct in North America?’ (31–44). Similarly, Sarah Ebner offers insight into Australian phonology, vocabulary, and grammar in Ch. 4, ‘English in Australia’ (45–61). In Ch. 5, ‘English in New Zealand’ (63–78), Marianne Hundt presents the history, phonology, lexicon, and grammar of the variety of English found in New Zealand. The next four chapters constitute the section of the book on nonnative varieties of English. In Ch. 6, ‘English in the Caribbean’ (79–91), Andrea Sand outlines the history of the use of English in Bermuda and Barbados, among other Caribbean nations, and offers Jamaica as a case study in Caribbean English. Paul Skandera provides a three-part classification of English in Africa, with specific references to Liberia, South Africa, and Tanzania, in Ch. 7,‘ A categorization of African Englishes’ (93–103). In Ch. 8, ‘When France refuses English’ (105–14), Albert Hamm outlines the evolution of French language legislation. In Ch. 9, ‘English in Switzerland: From foreign language to lingua franca’ (115–23), Urs Dürmüller offers two models of the status of the English language in Switzerland. The last four chapters make up the section on the functional aspects of English as a world language. In Ch. 10, ‘Learner English’ (125–33), Cornelia Tschichold examines the abilities of contrastive analysis, error analysis, interlanguage, and markedness to explain the difficulties in the acquisition of English by nonnative speakers. Pius ten Hacken raises the question of which standard/which variety of English should be chosen in the creation of a dictionary in Ch. 11, ‘Dictionaries of non-British varieties of English’ (135–47). In Ch. 12, ‘C. K. Ogden’s “Basic English”: A critical assessment’ (149–58), D. J. Allerton criticizes the short-sightedness of the development of Basic English and ends the chapter with a call for a modern, more soundly based Basic English. Finally, in Ch. 13, ‘The continuing spread of English: Anglo-American conspiracy or global grassroots movement?’ (159–69), Christian Mair examines the two predominant theories as to why the English language continued to spread in the twentieth century despite the demise of the British Empire and a momentary US weakness during the Cold War. Though more broad than deep, this book can serve as a supplement to classes on World Englishes and language policy. Richard W. Hallett Northeastern Illinois University Copyright © 2004 Linguistic Society of America

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.080
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it