MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2156132504 · doi:10.26077/f79k-vv35

Optical Design and Performance of the Odin UV/Visible Spectrograph and Infrared Imager Instrument

2025· article· en· W2156132504 on OpenAlexaffabout
Gabriel D. Warshaw, D. L. Desaulniers, Douglas A. Degenstein

Bibliographic record

VenueDigital Commons - USU (Utah State University) · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicCalibration and Measurement Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSpectrographRemote sensingPayload (computing)OpticsAeronomyStray lightTelescopePhysicsCollimatorAirglowAtmosphere (unit)AstronomyComputer scienceMeteorologyGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Sweden's Odin international scientific small satellite is planned for launch into a sun synchronous low earth orbit in 1998. Odin's mission will be both astronomy and atmospheric science (aeronomy). Its principle aeronomy payload is a high performance, lightweight (12 kilograms) ultraviolet/visible imaging spectrograph and infrared imager, that will point at the limb of the earth's upper atmosphere and measure molecular species associated with ozone chemistry, detect aerosols and tomographically measure and map ozone. The Canadian Space Agency is funding this payload, which has the acronym "OSIRIS", and Routes Inc. is currently building the flight model. OSIRIS is effectively two optical instruments mounted in a common optical housing and supported by common electronics. The first instrument consists of three infrared telescopes, each with an Indium Gallium Arsenide (InGaAs) linear detector. The second part is a high precision imaging spectrograph with a wavelength range of 280 to 800 nanometers, which uses a UV-enhanced CCD. The imaging spectrograph uses compact reflective optics and an aspheric reflective ruled grating, and provides excellent spectral imaging performance and stray-light rejection. This paper first briefly describes the overall instrument and then describes the optical design and the Development Model optical and sky test performance results. This paper includes a brief description of how OSIRIS will obtain valuable new environmental information on the upper atmosphere, and the requirements this places on the instruments optical design.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.178
Teacher spread0.166 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations25
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDigital Commons - USU (Utah State University)Same topicCalibration and Measurement TechniquesFrench-language works237,207