MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

The Role of Local Depositors in Controlling Expenses in Small‐Scale Financial Intermediation: An Empirical Analysis

2007· article· en· W2156321232 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueEconomica · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicMicrofinance and Financial Inclusion
Canadian institutionsQueen's UniversityUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLoanBusinessMoral hazardNet interest incomeFinancial intermediaryFinancial institutionOperating expenseFinancial systemIntermediationFinanceAgency costNet incomeInterest rateCapital (architecture)EconomicsIncentive

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Using data on Irish loan funds, a nineteenth‐century quasi‐bank system, we explore how the capital structure affects managerial agency to impact non‐interest expenses. These organizations had no equity‐holders and were financed by deposits and ‘capital’, comprising donations and accumulated profits, creating problems of managerial moral hazard. Higher net income (before non‐interest expenses) is associated with higher salaries and other non‐interest expenses. More surprisingly, higher ‘capital’–deposit ratios led to higher expenses even after controlling for net income. While this institution is unique, the findings suggest that depositors could assist in controlling expenses in microfinance organizations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.024
Threshold uncertainty score0.992

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it