MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2156594156 · doi:10.1109/fuzzy.2010.5584407

Possibilistic regression analysis of influential factors in the planning and implementation of occupational health and safety management systems

2010· article· en· W2156594156 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicFuzzy Systems and Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConvex hullComputer scienceOccupational safety and healthRegression analysisHullFuzzy logicRisk analysis (engineering)Operations researchEngineeringBusinessMathematicsArtificial intelligenceRegular polygonMachine learningMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The code of Occupational Health and Safety (OHS) is an important regulation to improve the on-the-job safety of employees. Several factors affect the planning and implementation of OHS management systems (OHSMS). The evaluation of OHS practice is the most important component when building a safety environment policy for employees and administration. Begin aware of subjective nature of factors affecting OHS and the use of statistical method, it becomes controversial as to a way of handling this type of survey data. This research presents a combination of possibilistic regression analysis with a convex hull approach to analyze the fitting factors that impact good practices of OHS. In addition, selected samples of data could be represented as fuzzy sets. This study offers an alternative platform to evaluate influential factors being used towards a successful implementation of the OHS policy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.052
Threshold uncertainty score0.145

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.392
Teacher spread0.350 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicFuzzy Systems and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207