MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2156817477 · doi:10.1109/glocomw.2008.ecp.25

End User Controlled Web Interaction Flow Using Service Oriented Architecture Model

2008· article· en· W2156817477 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMultimedia Communication and Technology
Canadian institutionsIBM (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceJavaScriptUser interfaceWeb serviceSoftware architectureHuman–computer interactionUser experience designSoftwareWorld Wide WebSoftware engineeringOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In traditional Web applications, user interface and interaction flows are controlled by software programs deployed on the server. These server side software programs are designed and implemented by software programmers, with no or very limited control provided to the end user.Although portal server technology and some JavaScript based solutions try to address this issue by offering some degree of control to the ability to substantially customize user interaction flow is not fully realised.In this paper, we will discuss how to address this limitation by leveraging the service oriented architecture model to build a visualization finite state machine that gives end users control over selection of service interfaces an UI artifacts, which results in a personalized user interface interaction flow and artifacts. We will demonstrate how this approach enables the end user to define a dynamic, highly customizable and individualized web interaction experience.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.770
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.058
GPT teacher head0.338
Teacher spread0.281 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMultimedia Communication and TechnologyFrench-language works237,207