MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2156831035 · doi:10.1164/rccm.200707-1064oc

Mechanisms of Dyspnea during Cycle Exercise in Symptomatic Patients with GOLD Stage I Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

2007· article· en· W2156831035 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCOPDSpirometryCardiologyVentilation (architecture)Internal medicineObstructive lung diseaseAirway obstructionPulmonary function testingPhysical therapyAirwayAnesthesiaAsthma

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

RATIONALE: Smokers with a relatively preserved FEV(1) may experience dyspnea and activity limitation but little is known about underlying mechanisms. OBJECTIVES: To examine ventilatory constraints during exercise in symptomatic smokers with GOLD (Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease) stage I chronic obstructive lung disease (COPD) so as to uncover potential mechanisms of dyspnea and exercise curtailment. METHODS: We compared resting pulmonary function and ventilatory responses (breathing pattern, operating lung volumes, pulmonary gas exchange) with incremental cycle exercise as well as Borg scale ratings of dyspnea intensity in 21 patients (post-bronchodilator FEV(1), 91 +/- 7% predicted, and FEV(1)/FVC, 60 +/- 6%; mean +/- SD) with significant breathlessness and 21 healthy age- and sex-matched control subjects with normal spirometry. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: In patients with COPD compared with control subjects, peak oxygen consumption and power output were significantly reduced by more than 20% and dyspnea ratings were higher for a given work rate and ventilation (P < 0.05). Compared with the control group, the COPD group had evidence of extensive small airway dysfunction with increased ventilatory requirements during exercise, likely on the basis of greater ventilation/perfusion abnormalities. Changes in end-expiratory lung volume during exercise were greater in COPD than in health (0.54 +/- 0.34 vs. 0.06 +/- 0.32 L, respectively; P < 0.05) and breathing pattern was correspondingly more shallow and rapid. Across groups, dyspnea intensity increased as ventilation expressed as a percentage of capacity increased (P < 0.0005) and as inspiratory reserve volume decreased (P < 0.0005). CONCLUSIONS: Exertional dyspnea in symptomatic patients with mild COPD is associated with the combined deleterious effects of higher ventilatory demand and abnormal dynamic ventilatory mechanics, both of which are potentially amenable to treatment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.158
Threshold uncertainty score0.819

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it