MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2156988484 · doi:10.1029/2009wr008815

An examination of direct ground wave soil moisture monitoring over an annual cycle of soil conditions

2010· article· en· W2156988484 on OpenAlexaff
Colby M. Steelman, Anthony L. Endres

Bibliographic record

VenueWater Resources Research · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGeophysical Methods and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWater contentEnvironmental scienceSoil scienceSoil waterRange (aeronautics)Dispersion (optics)Atmospheric sciencesGeologyGeotechnical engineeringMaterials sciencePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Direct ground wave (DGW) measurements obtained with ground‐penetrating radar have been used in a number of previous studies to estimate volumetric water content in the shallow soil zone; however, these studies have generally involved controlled field experiments or measurements collected across limited natural ranges of soil moisture conditions. To further investigate the capacity of this method, we have undertaken an extensive field study using multifrequency (i.e., 225, 450, and 900 MHz) DGW measurements to monitor a complete annual cycle of soil water content variations typical of midlatitude climates at three sites with different soil textures. The use of common‐midpoint surveys allowed us to understand the nature and evolution of the near‐surface electromagnetic wavefields and their impact on DGW moisture predictions. We present the novel characterization of a wide‐range of seasonal moisture dynamics including soil freezing and thawing process using multifrequency DGW measurements for a range of soil textures. These data showed significant temporal variations in both the near‐surface wavefield and multifrequency DGW velocities corresponding to both seasonal and shorter‐term variations in soil conditions. Although all of the measurement sites displayed similar temporal responses, the rate and magnitude of these velocity variations corresponded to varying soil water contents, which were controlled by the soil textural properties. Although there were no observed systematic differences in DGW velocities due to frequency dispersion for the 225–900 MHz range, the DGW measurements obtained using higher‐frequency antennas was less impacted by near‐surface wavefield interference due to their shorter signal pulse duration. DGW velocity measurements combined with an appropriate dielectric mixing formula provided quantitative predictions of soil water content that accurately replicated the soil sample data over the annual cycle of moisture conditions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.341
Teacher spread0.310 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations43
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWater Resources ResearchSame topicGeophysical Methods and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207