Optimal Coding of Multilayer and Multiversion Video Streams
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Traditional video servers partially cope with heterogeneous client populations by maintaining a few versions of the same stream with different bit rates. More recent video servers leverage multilayer scalable coding techniques to customize the quality for individual clients. In both cases, heuristic, error-prone, techniques are currently used by administrators to determine either the rate of each stream version, or the granularity and rate of each layer in a multilayer scalable stream. In this paper, we propose an algorithm to determine the optimal rate and encoding granularity of each layer in a scalable video stream that maximizes a system-defined utility function for a given client distribution. The proposed algorithm can be used to compute the optimal rates of multiversion streams as well. Our algorithm is general in the sense that it can employ arbitrary utility functions for clients. We implement our algorithm and verify its optimality, and we show how various structuring of scalable video streams affect the client utilities. To demonstrate the generality of our algorithm, we consider three utility functions in our experiments. These utility functions model various aspects of streaming systems, including the effective rate received by clients, the mismatch between client bandwidth and received stream rate, and the client-perceived quality in terms of PSNR. We compare our algorithm against a heuristic algorithm that has been used before in the literature, and we show that our algorithm outperforms it in all cases.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it