Optimal Coding of Multilayer and Multiversion Video Streams
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Traditional video servers partially cope with heterogeneous client populations by maintaining a few versions of the same stream with different bit rates. More recent video servers leverage multilayer scalable coding techniques to customize the quality for individual clients. In both cases, heuristic, error-prone, techniques are currently used by administrators to determine either the rate of each stream version, or the granularity and rate of each layer in a multilayer scalable stream. In this paper, we propose an algorithm to determine the optimal rate and encoding granularity of each layer in a scalable video stream that maximizes a system-defined utility function for a given client distribution. The proposed algorithm can be used to compute the optimal rates of multiversion streams as well. Our algorithm is general in the sense that it can employ arbitrary utility functions for clients. We implement our algorithm and verify its optimality, and we show how various structuring of scalable video streams affect the client utilities. To demonstrate the generality of our algorithm, we consider three utility functions in our experiments. These utility functions model various aspects of streaming systems, including the effective rate received by clients, the mismatch between client bandwidth and received stream rate, and the client-perceived quality in terms of PSNR. We compare our algorithm against a heuristic algorithm that has been used before in the literature, and we show that our algorithm outperforms it in all cases.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".