MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2157129937 · doi:10.1029/2004gb002249

Thresholds for warming‐induced growth decline at elevational tree line in the Yukon Territory, Canada

2004· article· en· W2157129937 on OpenAlexfundaboutno aff
Rosanne D’Arrigo, Robert K. Kaufmann, Nicole Davi, Gordon C. Jacoby, Cheryl Laskowski, Ranga B. Myneni, Paolo Cherubini

Bibliographic record

VenueGlobal Biogeochemical Cycles · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicTree-ring climate responses
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersLamont-Doherty Earth Observatory, Columbia UniversityOffice of ScienceParks CanadaU.S. Department of Energy
KeywordsTree lineLatitudeEnvironmental sciencePrecipitationDendrochronologyClimatologyAtmospheric sciencesClimate changeBrowningGlobal warmingPhysical geographyGeographyEcologyBiologyMeteorologyGeologyHorticulture

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A few tree ring studies indicate recent growth declines at northern latitudes. The precise causes are not well understood. Here we identify a temperature threshold for decline in a tree ring record from a well‐established temperature‐sensitive site at elevational tree line in northwestern Canada. The positive ring width/temperature relationship has weakened such that a pre‐1965 linear model systematically overpredicts tree ring widths from 1965 to 1999. A nonlinear model shows an inverted U‐shaped relationship between this chronology and summer temperatures, with an optimal July–August average temperature of 11.3°C based on a nearby station. This optimal value has been consistently exceeded since the 1960s, and the concurrent decline demonstrates that even at tree line, trees can be negatively affected when temperatures warm beyond a physiological threshold. If warming continues without significant gains in effective precipitation, the large‐scale greening of recent decades could be replaced by large‐scale browning. Such browning could slow or reverse carbon uptake by northern forests.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.071
Threshold uncertainty score0.142

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations302
Published2004
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGlobal Biogeochemical CyclesSame topicTree-ring climate responsesFrench-language works237,207