MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2157265503 · doi:10.1093/humrep/det124

Severe early ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome following GnRH agonist trigger with the addition of 1500 IU hCG

2013· article· en· W2157265503 on OpenAlexaff
Ayşe Seyhan, Barış Ata, Mehtap Polat, Weon‐Young Son, Hakan Yaralı́, Michael H. Dahan

Bibliographic record

VenueHuman Reproduction · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOvarian function and disorders
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityMcGill University Health Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOvarian hyperstimulation syndromeLuteal phaseAgonistMedicineOvulation inductionOvulationGynecologyPregnancyAndrologyInternal medicineIn vitro fertilisationBiologyHormoneReceptor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

STUDY QUESTION: Is severe early ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) completely prevented with the GnRH agonist trigger and 1500 IU hCG luteal rescue protocol? SUMMARY ANSWER: Severe early OHSS can occur even after the GnRH agonist trigger and 1500 IU hCG luteal rescue protocol. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Prior studies including over 200 women who received the GnRH agonist trigger and 1500 hCG luteal rescue protocol have reported complete prevention of severe early OHSS. Only a few late OHSS cases have been reported and it has been suggested that this protocol can be safely applied to any women under risk. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: This retrospective cohort study included all women who were at high risk of OHSS and were given the GnRH agonist trigger plus hCG luteal rescue protocol between December 2008 and August 2012 in the two participating centers. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: There were 23 women with a mean estradiol level of 4891 ± 2214 pg/ml and a mean number of >12 mm follicles of 20 ± 6 on the day of ovulation triggering. OHSS was categorized according to the Golan criteria. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Overall 6 of the 23 (26%) women developed severe OHSS. Five women had severe early OHSS requiring ascites drainage and hospitalization and three of these women did not undergo embryo transfer. The number of follicles measuring 10-14 mm on the day of triggering was significantly different between women who developed severe early OHSS and those who did not. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: The small number of women with severe early OHSS may have prevented identification of other significant risk factors. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: Although the GnRH agonist plus 1500 IU hCG luteal rescue protocol significantly decreases the risk of severe OHSS, this life threatening complication can still occur in high-risk patients. It would be prudent to avoid hCG luteal rescue and freeze all embryos for future transfer in such women particularly when there are ≥18 follicles with 10-14 mm diameters even with few larger follicles.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations148
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHuman ReproductionSame topicOvarian function and disordersFrench-language works237,207