MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2157273202 · doi:10.1016/j.femsle.2004.08.043

Occurrence of d-histidine residues in antimicrobial poly(arginylâhistidine), conferring resistance to enzymatic hydrolysis

2004· article· en· W2157273202 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueFEMS Microbiology Letters · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicBiopolymer Synthesis and Applications
Canadian institutionsInstitute for Biological Sciences
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHistidinePeptideBiochemistryChemistryAntimicrobialHydrolysateHydrolysisEnzymeOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The antimicrobial peptide poly(arginyl-histidine) is secreted by the ergot fungus Verticillium kibiense. We previously showed that poly(arginyl-histidine) from the fungus inhibits the growth of certain microorganisms more effectively than that chemically synthesized from the L-form of arginine and histidine, implying some substantial differences between the fungal and synthetic peptides. To elucidate what causes such differences, we here investigated the structural features of the fungal peptides. The acid hydrolysates of the fungal peptide contained d-histidine. When synthetic poly(L-arginyl-D-histidine) mimicking the fungal peptide was added to the culture of Salmonella typhimurium together with poly(L-arginyl-L-histidine), poly(L-arginyl-D-histidine) was not easily degraded during the incubation compared with poly(L-arginyl-L-histidine). We concluded that the d-form of histidine residues in the fungal peptide prolongs the life of the peptide leading to the enhancement of antimicrobial activity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.886

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it