MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2157897932 · doi:10.1109/tifs.2010.2051255

A Wavelet-PCA-Based Fingerprinting Scheme for Peer-to-Peer Video File Sharing

2010· article· en· W2157897932 on OpenAlexaff
Xiaoli Li, Sridhar Krishnan, Ngok-Wah Ma

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Steganography and Watermarking Techniques
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceRobustness (evolution)Fingerprint (computing)WaveletPrincipal component analysisData miningArtificial intelligencePattern recognition (psychology)EmbeddingFingerprint recognitionRepresentation (politics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In order to utilize peer-to-peer (P2P) networks in legal content distribution to benefit the legal content providers, copyright protection needs to be enhanced. In this paper, a fingerprint generation and embedding method is proposed for complex P2P file sharing networks. In this method, wavelet and principal component analysis (PCA) techniques are used for fingerprint generation. First, the wavelet technique obtains a low-frequency representation of the test image (or source file, which is assumed to be one I frame of a video with a DVD quality) and PCA finds the features of the representation. Then, a set of fingerprint matrices can be created based on a proposed algorithm. Finally, each matrix combines with the low-frequency representative to become a unique fingerprinted matrix. The fingerprinted matrix is not only much smaller than the original image in size but also contains the most important information. Without this information, the quality of the reconstructed image will be very poor. Thus, the fingerprinted file is more suitable for distribution in P2P networks, because, in the distribution stage, the uniquely fingerprinted matrix will only be dispensed by the source host and leave the rest for P2P networks to handle. On the other hand, among other frames of the same video which are not decomposed, some will be embedded with sharable fingerprints. The relationship between unique fingerprint and sharable fingerprint and the purpose of using it will be discussed in the paper. Our result indicates that the proposed fingerprint has shown strong robustness against common attacks such as Gaussian noise, median filter, and lossy compression.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations21
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and SecuritySame topicAdvanced Steganography and Watermarking TechniquesFrench-language works237,207