MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2158006286 · doi:10.4314/wsa.v29i4.5040

An efficient optimisation method in groundwater resource management

2004· article· en· W2158006286 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueWater SA · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicReservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGroundwaterAquiferGroundwater flowMonte Carlo methodComputer scienceMathematical optimizationPoint (geometry)Resource (disambiguation)Operations researchMathematicsGeologyStatisticsGeotechnical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Uncertainty in input parameters to groundwater flow problems has been recognised as an impediment to designing efficient groundwater management strategies. The most popular approach to tackling this problem has been through the Monte Carlo approach. However, this approach is generally too expensive in terms of computer time because of the number of scenarios required to ensure reliable statistics. Furthermore, solutions obtained through this approach are not necessarily robust. In this paper, it is shown how groundwater management problems, where input parameters are uncertain can be reformulated as second-order cone optimisation (SOCO) problems, which are efficiently solved by recently developed interior-point methods. Results for a real-world case application of a groundwater aquifer found in Kenya are presented. Water SA Vol.29(4): 359-363

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.283
Threshold uncertainty score0.347

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it