MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2158108008 · doi:10.1109/tvt.2008.924988

An Empirical Model for Nonstationary Ricean Fading

2009· article· en· W2158108008 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMillimeter-Wave Propagation and Modeling
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFadingFading distributionEnvelope (radar)Autoregressive modelAutocorrelationWeibull fadingChannel state informationChannel (broadcasting)Statistical physicsComputer scienceMathematicsStatisticsAlgorithmTelecommunicationsPhysicsRayleigh fadingWireless

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ricean fading is common in dense urban cellular networks and, as a mobile moves through that environment, the K-factor of the Ricean fading will change. This paper presents a statistical model for dense urban vehicular nonstationary Ricean fading, where the K-factor gradually changes due to movement through changing surroundings. This model is empirical and is based on K-factor fluctuations that are observed in dense urban cellular radio channel measurements. The K -factor is modeled using a random process with a distribution that is fit to the measured K-factor values. An autoregressive (AR) model is also used to ensure that the autocorrelation of the simulated K-factor process matches the empirical data. The nonstationary Ricean fading envelope that is generated using this model is verified by comparing it with the fading envelope that is observed in the measurements.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.827
Threshold uncertainty score0.701

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it