MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2158108008 · doi:10.1109/tvt.2008.924988

An Empirical Model for Nonstationary Ricean Fading

2009· article· en· W2158108008 on OpenAlexaff
Geoffrey G. Messier, Jennifer A. Hartwell

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMillimeter-Wave Propagation and Modeling
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFadingFading distributionEnvelope (radar)Autoregressive modelAutocorrelationWeibull fadingChannel state informationChannel (broadcasting)Statistical physicsComputer scienceMathematicsStatisticsAlgorithmTelecommunicationsPhysicsRayleigh fadingWireless

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ricean fading is common in dense urban cellular networks and, as a mobile moves through that environment, the K-factor of the Ricean fading will change. This paper presents a statistical model for dense urban vehicular nonstationary Ricean fading, where the K-factor gradually changes due to movement through changing surroundings. This model is empirical and is based on K-factor fluctuations that are observed in dense urban cellular radio channel measurements. The K -factor is modeled using a random process with a distribution that is fit to the measured K-factor values. An autoregressive (AR) model is also used to ensure that the autocorrelation of the simulated K-factor process matches the empirical data. The nonstationary Ricean fading envelope that is generated using this model is verified by comparing it with the fading envelope that is observed in the measurements.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Vehicular TechnologySame topicMillimeter-Wave Propagation and ModelingFrench-language works237,207