MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2158191474 · doi:10.5539/cis.v6n3p48

Combination of Naïve Bayes Classifier and K-Nearest Neighbor (cNK) in the Classification Based Predictive Models

2013· article· en· W2158191474 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueComputer and Information Science · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicBayesian Modeling and Causal Inference
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceNaive Bayes classifierClassifier (UML)k-nearest neighbors algorithmBayes classifierArtificial intelligenceProfitability indexMachine learningBayes' theoremPattern recognition (psychology)Data miningSupport vector machineBayesian probabilityFinance

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this study, we present a new classifier that combines the distance-based algorithm K-Nearest Neighbor and statistical based Naïve Bayes Classifier. That is equipped with the power of both but avoid their weakness. The performance of the proposed algorithm in terms of accuracy is experimented on some standard datasets from the machine-learning repository of University of California and compared with some of the art algorithms. The experiments show that in most of the cases the proposed algorithm outperforms the other to some extent. Finally we apply the algorithm for predicting profitability positions of some financial institutions of Bangladesh using data provided by the central bank.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.921
Threshold uncertainty score0.704

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.010
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it