MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2158365388 · doi:10.1109/mcise.2003.1238705

The direction-of-arrival problem: coming at you

2003· article· en· W2158365388 on OpenAlexaff
Dianne P. O’Leary

Bibliographic record

VenueComputing in Science & Engineering · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicDirection-of-Arrival Estimation Techniques
Canadian institutionsCentre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSubmarineDirection of arrivalComputer scienceComputationNavySIGNAL (programming language)Eigenvalues and eigenvectorsTransmitterAlgorithmReal-time computingTelecommunicationsEngineeringPhysicsMarine engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

If you break your leg on a mountain but have a cellular telephone or other transmitter with you, you would hope a rescuer could determine the direction in which to travel to reach you. Similarly, if a navy detects a transmission from a submarine, it would want to determine the signal's direction of arrival (DOA) to locate that submarine. The problem is complicated if more than one signal appears - especially if the number of signals is unknown - and even more complicated if you or the submarine is moving. Surprisingly, we see that your rescuer can solve an eigenvalue problem (involving the product of some unknown matrices) and use that information to find you. The DOA-finding algorithm we use is called Esprit. To understand the process, we also use several matrix decompositions and illustrate the necessity of using update-techniques for real-time computations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.022

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.004
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0050.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueComputing in Science & EngineeringSame topicDirection-of-Arrival Estimation TechniquesFrench-language works237,207