A Robust Adaptive Dimension Reduction Technique With Application to Array Processing
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We develop a data-adaptive dimension reduction algorithm that is robust against out-of-sector sources in application to array processing. The dimension reduction is done as a linear transformation (matrix filter). The matrix filter is designed adaptively such that the signal power within a certain sector is preserved while the out-of-sector power is maximally rejected. The columns of the beamspace matrix are designed sequentially, one column at a time. This sequential implementation is carried out by imposing orthogonality constraints between beamspace matrix columns. Hence, the white noise property at the output of the beamspace preprocessor is preserved. The latter is important for subsequent data processing. The proposed algorithm is computationally less expensive as compared to the existing data-adaptive beamspace design techniques. Simulation results validate the robustness of the developed algorithm, and they show its effectiveness and superiority to the existing algorithms.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it