MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2158535000 · doi:10.1109/imtc.2007.379320

3D Head Tracking and Facial Expression Recovery using an Anthropometric Muscle-based Active Appearance Model

2007· article· en· W2158535000 on OpenAlexafffund
Marius D. Cordea, Emil M. Petriu, Dorina C. Petriu

Bibliographic record

VenueConference proceedings - IEEE Instrumentation/Measurement Technology Conference · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicFace recognition and analysis
Canadian institutionsCarleton UniversityUniversity of Ottawa
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaElse Kröner-Fresenius-Stiftung
KeywordsComputer visionArtificial intelligenceComputer scienceActive appearance modelFacial expressionPoseKalman filterFace (sociological concept)Extended Kalman filterFeature (linguistics)3d modelOrientation (vector space)Pattern recognition (psychology)MathematicsImage (mathematics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper describes a novel 3D model-based tracking algorithm allowing real-time recovery of 3D position, orientation and facial expressions of a moving head. The method uses a 3D anthropometric muscle-based active appearance model (3D AMB AAM), a feature-based matching algorithm, and an extended Kalman filter (EKF) pose and expression estimator. Our model is an extension of the classical 2D AAM, and uses a generic 3D wireframe model of the face, based on two sets of controls: the anatomically motivated muscle actuators to model facial expressions and statistically-based anthropometrical controls to model different facial types.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.114
GPT teacher head0.313
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2007
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueConference proceedings - IEEE Instrumentation/Measurement Technology ConferenceSame topicFace recognition and analysisFrench-language works237,207