An Invariance Relation and a Unified Method to Derive Stationary Queue-Length Distributions
Bibliographic record
Abstract
For a broad class of discrete- and continuous-time queueing systems, we show that the stationary number of customers in system (queue plus servers) is the sum of two independent random variables, one of which is the stationary number of customers in queue and the other is the number of customers that arrive during the time a customer spends in service. We call this relation an invariance relation in the sense that it does not change for a variety of single-sever queues (with batch arrivals and batch services) and some multiserver queues (with batch arrivals and deterministic service times) that satisfy a certain set of assumptions. Making use of this relation, we also present a simple method of deriving the probability generating functions (PGFs) of the stationary numbers in queue and in system, as well as some of their properties. This is illustrated by several examples, which show that new simple derivations of old results as well as new results can be obtained in a unified manner. Furthermore, we show that the invariance relation and the method we are presenting are easily generalized to analyze queues with batch Markovian arrival process (BMAP) arrivals. Most of the results are presented under the discrete-time setting. The corresponding continuous-time results, however, are covered as well because deriving the results for continuous-time queues runs exactly parallel to that for their discrete-time counterparts.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.010 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".