MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2158577229

Removal of hydrogen sulfide from gas streams using biological processes - a review.

2006· article· en· W2158577229 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Murtuza Ali Syed, Gabriela Soreanu, P. Falletta, Michel Béland

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Biosystems Engineering · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemical Engineering
TopicOdor and Emission Control Technologies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHydrogen sulfideBiogasBiofilterSulfurAnaerobic digestionWaste managementSulfideEnvironmental chemistryChemistryBiomass (ecology)Environmental scienceWastewaterPulp and paper industryMethaneEnvironmental engineeringEcologyOrganic chemistryBiology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Syed, M., Soreanu, G., Falletta, P. and Beland M. 2006. Removal of hydrogen sulfide from gas streams using biological processes A review. Canadian Biosystems Engineering/Le genie des biosystemes au Canada 48: 2.1 2.14. Hydrogen sulfide (H2S) is a toxic and odorous compound present in biogas produced by the anaerobic digestion of biosolids and other organic materials. Due to its corrosive nature in internal combustion engines, biological hydrogen sulfide removal processes are being investigated to overcome the chemical and disposal costs associated with existing chemically-based removal processes. Both phototrophic and chemotrophic bacteria are suitable candidate microorganisms for hydrogen sulfide bioxidation. Phototrophic C. limicola is an ideal bacterium in these biological removal processes due to its ability to grow under anaerobic conditions using only inorganic substrates and a light source and its efficient extracellular production of elemental sulfur from H2S. Phototrophic fixed-film reactors are an interesting concept for cost-effective H2S removal from biogas due to their ability to operate for long periods of time without requiring a biomass separation step and their ability to operate under higher and variable loadings. However, a light source is one of the key constraints for this process. Chemotrophic bacteria can also be used in fixed-film reactors to produce elemental sulfur instead of sulfate under controlled oxygen conditions. These bioscrubbers are gaining acceptance for treating hydrogen sulfide containing gases from a wide variety of sources such as biogas, off-gases from wastewater treatment plants, livestock farms, etc. The biofilter medium is inexpensive and may contain sufficient micro-nutrients for the microbial communities. Future research needs include the optimization of the anaerobic biofiltration process, the development of a system combining the advantages of phototrophic and chemotrophic bacteria and the possible co-removal of siloxanes within this process.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.004
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.209
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations308
Published2006
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Biosystems EngineeringSame topicOdor and Emission Control TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207