MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2158859726 · doi:10.1109/glocom.2010.5683677

Minimum Broadcast Decoding Delay for Generalized Instantly Decodable Network Coding

2010· article· en· W2158859726 on OpenAlexaff
Sameh Sorour, Shahrokh Valaee

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCooperative Communication and Network Coding
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDecoding methodsLinear network codingClique problemCoding (social sciences)HeuristicGraphMathematicsWirelessAlgorithmComputer scienceMathematical optimizationTheoretical computer scienceComputer networkTelecommunicationsNetwork packet

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we introduce the concept of generalized instantly decodable network coding (G-IDNC) to further minimize decoding delay in wireless broadcast, compared to strict instantly decodable network coding (S-IDNC), studied in. G-IDNC loosens the strict instant decodability constraint in order to target more receivers while preserving the attractive properties of S-IDNC. We show that the minimum decoding delay problem for G-IDNC can be formulated as a maximum weight clique problem over a well structured graph. Since finding the maximum weight clique of a graph is NP-hard, we design a simple heuristic G-IDNC algorithm with sub-optimal performance. However, simulation results show that both proposed optimal and heuristic G-IDNC algorithms considerably outperform several other S-IDNC and G-IDNC optimal and heuristic approaches.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations121
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCooperative Communication and Network CodingFrench-language works237,207