MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2158859726 · doi:10.1109/glocom.2010.5683677

Minimum Broadcast Decoding Delay for Generalized Instantly Decodable Network Coding

2010· article· en· W2158859726 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCooperative Communication and Network Coding
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDecoding methodsLinear network codingClique problemCoding (social sciences)HeuristicGraphMathematicsWirelessAlgorithmComputer scienceMathematical optimizationTheoretical computer scienceComputer networkTelecommunicationsNetwork packet

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we introduce the concept of generalized instantly decodable network coding (G-IDNC) to further minimize decoding delay in wireless broadcast, compared to strict instantly decodable network coding (S-IDNC), studied in. G-IDNC loosens the strict instant decodability constraint in order to target more receivers while preserving the attractive properties of S-IDNC. We show that the minimum decoding delay problem for G-IDNC can be formulated as a maximum weight clique problem over a well structured graph. Since finding the maximum weight clique of a graph is NP-hard, we design a simple heuristic G-IDNC algorithm with sub-optimal performance. However, simulation results show that both proposed optimal and heuristic G-IDNC algorithms considerably outperform several other S-IDNC and G-IDNC optimal and heuristic approaches.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.789
Threshold uncertainty score0.766

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it