MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2158936994 · doi:10.1353/esc.2007.0003

Rearranging Furniture in Jane Eyre and Villette

2005· article· en· W2158936994 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueEnglish studies in Canada · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicWalter Benjamin Studies Compilation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtRealismLiteratureArt historyAestheticsPhilosophyHistory

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Rearranging Furniture in Jane Eyre and Villette Michael Klotz "Where did you get your copies?" "Out of my head." "That head that I see now on your shoulders?" "Yes, sir." "Has it other furniture of the same kind within?" Charlotte Brontë, Jane Eyre To dwell means to leave traces. In the interior, these are accentuated. Coverlets and antimacassars, cases and containers are devised in abundance; in these, the traces of the most ordinary objects of use are imprinted. In just the same way, the traces of the inhabitant are imprinted in the interior. Walter Benjamin, The Arcades Project The examples are numerous. In Persuasion, Anne Elliot silently inventories Captain Harville's "rooms so small"; in Our Mutual Friend, the narrator anatomizes Mr and Mrs Boffin's divided parlour (which is the "queerest of rooms"); in Middlemarch, Dorothea Brooke endures her "dreary oppression" amongst the "shrunken furniture" of her boudoir; and in The Spoils of Poynton, the "tell-tale things" make their way into Fleda Vetch's heart. Why do nineteenth-century novels place such emphasis on the furnishing of rooms? The standard starting point for a consideration of objects in the realist novel is Ian Watt, who has suggested that "solidity of [End Page 10] setting" is achieved by the description of "moveable objects in the physical world" (17, 26). In a similar vein, Martin Price writes of the unmotivated physical detail as one of the hallmarks of realism, asserting that "the triumph of the particular is the triumph of formal realism" (262). And in his essay "The Reality Effect," Roland Barthes argues that superfluity of detail is an inextricable feature of literary realism. But throughout novels of the nineteenth century the attentive description of objects does more than establish the concreteness of the fictional world. The narrator of The Old Curiosity Shop remarks that "We are so much in the habit of allowing impressions to be made upon us by external objects … that I am not sure I should have been so thoroughly possessed by this one subject, but for the heaps of fantastic things I had seen huddled together in the curiosity dealer's warehouse. These, crowding on my mind … as it were, brought [Nell's] condition palpably before me" (13). Yet in spite of this telling image—the "heaps of … things" literally "crowding" the narrator's mind—critical considerations of the Victorian novel have nearly dismissed the importance of "things." What I want to suggest about Jane Eyre and Villette is related to the way that descriptive detail becomes bound up with narration in the examples I have provided above, but the reading I have in mind is somewhat more specific: it is grounded in work on the cultural significance of the cluttered domestic rooms of the Victorian period and in theoretical writing on the interior. In The Victorian Parlour, Thad Logan analyzes the Victorian drawing room both as a cultural artifact "delimiting the horizons of character, and constituting the particular visual, spatial, and sensory embodiments of human culture at a particular historical moment," and as a "subject of mimetic representation" in the literature of the period (1, 202). To view the Victorian drawing-room from her perspective is to see a space (both actual and "virtual"/literary) abounding with "things" to be read both as a part of nineteenth-century consumer culture and as they reflect a specific aesthetic and ideological outlook. "The characteristic bourgeois interior," she says, "becomes increasingly full of objects, cluttered—to modern eyes, at least—with a profusion of things, things that are not primarily functional, that do not have obvious use-value, but rather participate in a decorative, semiotic economy. This eruption of objects in the home was, of course, part of the larger-scale evolution of the Victorian panoply of things" (26). For Logan, the Victorians' object-strewn rooms reflect an unspoken domestic rhetoric expressed in a "semiotic economy" that can be parsed and comprehended as a language. She proposes a "grammar of the parlour" [End Page 11] to classify the ways that particular objects can and are combined in a specific domestic space: "segments of domestic space perceived as distinct and unified areas (parlour, bedroom, library, etc.) are comparable...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.656
Threshold uncertainty score0.664

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it