MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2158936994 · doi:10.1353/esc.2007.0003

Rearranging Furniture in Jane Eyre and Villette

2005· article· en· W2158936994 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Michael Klotz

Bibliographic record

VenueEnglish studies in Canada · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicWalter Benjamin Studies Compilation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtRealismLiteratureArt historyAestheticsPhilosophyHistory

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Rearranging Furniture in Jane Eyre and Villette Michael Klotz "Where did you get your copies?" "Out of my head." "That head that I see now on your shoulders?" "Yes, sir." "Has it other furniture of the same kind within?" Charlotte Brontë, Jane Eyre To dwell means to leave traces. In the interior, these are accentuated. Coverlets and antimacassars, cases and containers are devised in abundance; in these, the traces of the most ordinary objects of use are imprinted. In just the same way, the traces of the inhabitant are imprinted in the interior. Walter Benjamin, The Arcades Project The examples are numerous. In Persuasion, Anne Elliot silently inventories Captain Harville's "rooms so small"; in Our Mutual Friend, the narrator anatomizes Mr and Mrs Boffin's divided parlour (which is the "queerest of rooms"); in Middlemarch, Dorothea Brooke endures her "dreary oppression" amongst the "shrunken furniture" of her boudoir; and in The Spoils of Poynton, the "tell-tale things" make their way into Fleda Vetch's heart. Why do nineteenth-century novels place such emphasis on the furnishing of rooms? The standard starting point for a consideration of objects in the realist novel is Ian Watt, who has suggested that "solidity of [End Page 10] setting" is achieved by the description of "moveable objects in the physical world" (17, 26). In a similar vein, Martin Price writes of the unmotivated physical detail as one of the hallmarks of realism, asserting that "the triumph of the particular is the triumph of formal realism" (262). And in his essay "The Reality Effect," Roland Barthes argues that superfluity of detail is an inextricable feature of literary realism. But throughout novels of the nineteenth century the attentive description of objects does more than establish the concreteness of the fictional world. The narrator of The Old Curiosity Shop remarks that "We are so much in the habit of allowing impressions to be made upon us by external objects … that I am not sure I should have been so thoroughly possessed by this one subject, but for the heaps of fantastic things I had seen huddled together in the curiosity dealer's warehouse. These, crowding on my mind … as it were, brought [Nell's] condition palpably before me" (13). Yet in spite of this telling image—the "heaps of … things" literally "crowding" the narrator's mind—critical considerations of the Victorian novel have nearly dismissed the importance of "things." What I want to suggest about Jane Eyre and Villette is related to the way that descriptive detail becomes bound up with narration in the examples I have provided above, but the reading I have in mind is somewhat more specific: it is grounded in work on the cultural significance of the cluttered domestic rooms of the Victorian period and in theoretical writing on the interior. In The Victorian Parlour, Thad Logan analyzes the Victorian drawing room both as a cultural artifact "delimiting the horizons of character, and constituting the particular visual, spatial, and sensory embodiments of human culture at a particular historical moment," and as a "subject of mimetic representation" in the literature of the period (1, 202). To view the Victorian drawing-room from her perspective is to see a space (both actual and "virtual"/literary) abounding with "things" to be read both as a part of nineteenth-century consumer culture and as they reflect a specific aesthetic and ideological outlook. "The characteristic bourgeois interior," she says, "becomes increasingly full of objects, cluttered—to modern eyes, at least—with a profusion of things, things that are not primarily functional, that do not have obvious use-value, but rather participate in a decorative, semiotic economy. This eruption of objects in the home was, of course, part of the larger-scale evolution of the Victorian panoply of things" (26). For Logan, the Victorians' object-strewn rooms reflect an unspoken domestic rhetoric expressed in a "semiotic economy" that can be parsed and comprehended as a language. She proposes a "grammar of the parlour" [End Page 11] to classify the ways that particular objects can and are combined in a specific domestic space: "segments of domestic space perceived as distinct and unified areas (parlour, bedroom, library, etc.) are comparable...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.918
Threshold uncertainty score0.163

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0100.005
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0200.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnglish studies in CanadaSame topicWalter Benjamin Studies CompilationFrench-language works237,207