Toward Personalized Sexual Medicine (Part 2): Testosterone Combined with a PDE5 Inhibitor Increases Sexual Satisfaction in Women with HSDD and FSAD, and a Low Sensitive System for Sexual Cues
Bibliographic record
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Low sexual desire in women may result from a relative insensitivity of the brain for sexual cues. Administration of sublingual 0.5 mg testosterone (T) increases the sensitivity of the brain to sexual cues. Sexual stimulation in the brain is necessary for phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor (PDE5i)-mediated increase in genital sexual response. Accordingly, a single dose of T+PDE5i might enhance sexual responsiveness, especially in women with low sensitivity for sexual cues. AIM: To assess the hypothesis that treatment with on-demand use of T+PDE5i improves sexual functioning, particularly in women who suffer from Hypoactive Sexual Desire Disorder (HSDD) as the result of a relative insensitivity for sexual cues. METHODS: In a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover design, 56 women with HSDD underwent three medication treatment regimes (placebo, T+PDE5i, and T with a serotonin receptor agonist; see also parts 1 and 3), which lasted 4 weeks each. In a participant-controlled ambulatory psychophysiological experiment at home (the first week of each drug treatment), physiological and subjective indices of sexual functioning were measured. In a bedroom experiment (the subsequent 3 weeks), sexual functioning was evaluated following each sexual event after the self-administration of study medication. Subjective evaluation of sexual functioning was also measured by weekly and monthly reports. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Subjective: sexual satisfaction, experienced genital arousal, sexual desire. Physiological: vaginal pulse amplitude. Cognitive: preconscious attentional bias. RESULTS: T+PDE5i, as compared with placebo, significantly improved physiological and subjective measures of sexual functioning during ambulatory psychophysiological lab conditions at home and during the sexual events, in women with low sensitivity for sexual cues. CONCLUSIONS: The present study demonstrated that on-demand T+PDE5i is a potentially promising treatment for women with HSDD, particularly in women with low sensitivity for sexual cues.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".