MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2159467941 · doi:10.1109/mmar.2011.6031318

Accurate feature matching for autonomous vehicle navigation in urban environments

2011· article· en· W2159467941 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRobotics and Sensor-Based Localization
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFeature (linguistics)Computer visionArtificial intelligenceMatching (statistics)Computer sciencePosition (finance)Inertial navigation systemInertial measurement unitFeature matchingFeature extractionOrientation (vector space)Field (mathematics)Image planeMap matchingImage (mathematics)Global Positioning SystemMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The research presented in this paper ultimately aims at accurate Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) navigation using camera(s) to augment inertial navigation unit data while flying through an urban environment. Accurate position and depth determination requires precise image feature location and matching. This paper investigates accurate feature matching enabling determination of image depth. The paper offers two unique contributions to the field. First, it is shown how to improve feature matching accuracy when a good position estimate is available. Secondly, it is shown how to increase the number of matched features. In this way, there is more data and it may be possible, in future research, to identify the depth plane a feature belongs to and so increase the accuracy of position determination. Preliminary results are reported.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.475
Threshold uncertainty score0.290

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicRobotics and Sensor-Based LocalizationFrench-language works237,207