MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2159498172 · doi:10.1109/icnn.1993.298666

Derivation of momentum LMS algorithms by minimizing objective functions

2002· article· en· W2159498172 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE International Conference on Neural Networks · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Adaptive Filtering Techniques
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLeast mean squares filterAlgorithmMinificationFunction (biology)Mean squared errorSquare (algebra)MathematicsSignal processingComputer scienceMomentum (technical analysis)Adaptive filterMathematical optimizationStatisticsDigital signal processing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The momentum least-mean-squares (m-LMS) algorithm is extensively used in neural network and signal processing applications, and is an arbitrary extension to the LMS algorithm. It is shown that several different versions of the m-LMS algorithm can be obtained by minimizing different objective functions. It appears that the minimization of weighted average square error function and the weighted accumulated square error function leads to two widely used m-LMS algorithms. The minimization of the weighted average square error function also provides two new versions of the m-LMS algorithm. These old and new versions of the m-LMS algorithm are applied to a parameter estimation problem. From the results, it is found that the new versions of the m-LMS algorithm provide smaller variance of the parameter estimates.< <ETX xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">&gt;</ETX>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.940
Threshold uncertainty score0.756

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it