MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2159526307 · doi:10.1109/icpr.2006.444

Detection Over Viewpoint via the Object Class Invariant

2006· article· en· W2159526307 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtificial intelligenceScale-invariant feature transformComputer scienceInvariant (physics)Class (philosophy)Computer visionObject (grammar)Probabilistic logicViewpointsCognitive neuroscience of visual object recognitionObject detectionPattern recognition (psychology)MathematicsImage (mathematics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this article, we present a new model of object class appearance over viewpoint, based on learning a relationship between scale-invariant image features (e.g. SIFT) and a geometric structure that we refer to as an OCI (object class invariant). The OCI is a perspective invariant defined across instances of an object class, and thereby serves as a common reference frame relating features over viewpoint change and object class. A single probabilistic OCI model can be learned to capture the rich multimodal nature of object class appearance in the presence of viewpoint change, providing an efficient alternative to the popular approach of training a battery of detectors at separate viewpoints and/or poses. Experimentation demonstrates that an OCI model of faces can be learned from a small number of natural, cluttered images, and used to detect faces exhibiting a large degree of appearance variation due to viewpoint change and intra-class variability (i.e. (sun)glasses, ethnicity, expression, etc.)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.955
Threshold uncertainty score0.241

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it