MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2159544284 · doi:10.1109/iwna.2001.980870

MPEG4 traffic modeling using the transform expand sample methodology

2002· article· en· W2159544284 on OpenAlexaff
Ashraf Matrawy, L. Lambadaris, Changcheng Huang

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicVideo Coding and Compression Technologies
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceEncoderTransfer (computing)Sample (material)TRACE (psycholinguistics)Bandwidth (computing)Encoding (memory)Real-time computingComputer networkArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The transfer of digital video will be a crucial component of the design of future home networking applications. This transfer was made feasible by the advancement of digital video encoding techniques that reduced the bandwidth required for this transfer to a practical level. MPEG4 is an encoding technique that is suitable for home networking applications with its low bit rate. It also has the advantage that allows viewers to interact with encoded objects. In this paper, we present our work that enables the study of MPEG4 properties and performance on the Internet using simulation. We propose a traffic generator that is able to generate traffic that has almost the same first and second order statistics as an original trace of MPEG4 frames that is generated using an MPEG4 encoder. We model and generate this traffic based on the transform expand sample (TES) methodology using TEStool. We present the model and show the performance of the generator in terms of good matching of the characteristics of the modeled trace.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.304
GPT teacher head0.331
Teacher spread0.028 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations78
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicVideo Coding and Compression TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207