Dynamic Aggregation of Set-Partitioning Constraints in Column Generation
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Column generation is often used to solve problems involving set-partitioning constraints, such as vehicle-routing and crew-scheduling problems. When these constraints are in large numbers and the columns have on average more than 8–12 nonzero elements, column generation often becomes inefficient because solving the master problem requires very long solution times at each iteration due to high degeneracy. To overcome this difficulty, we introduce a dynamic constraint aggregation method that reduces the number of set-partitioning constraints in the master problem by aggregating some of them according to an equivalence relation. To guarantee optimality, this equivalence relation is updated dynamically throughout the solution process. Tests on the linear relaxation of the simultaneous vehicle and crew-scheduling problem in urban mass transit show that this method significantly reduces the size of the master problem, degeneracy, and solution times, especially for larger problems. In fact, for an instance involving 1,600 set-partitioning constraints, the master problem solution time is reduced by a factor of 8.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it