MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2160149488 · doi:10.1109/icnn.1996.549071

Neurosolver solves blocks world problems

2002· article· en· W2160149488 on OpenAlexaff
Andrzej Bieszczad, B. Pagurek

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of International Conference on Neural Networks (ICNN'96) · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicEvolutionary Algorithms and Applications
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceConstruct (python library)Problem solverTask (project management)SolverProcess (computing)Artificial intelligenceNeuromorphic engineeringControl (management)Space (punctuation)State (computer science)Theoretical computer scienceProgramming languageSoftware engineeringArtificial neural networkEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We report an ongoing work on a biologically inspired device, the Neurosolver, introduced in our (1995) earlier paper. To explore and improve the Neurosolver's capabilities, we attempt to apply it to a task of rearranging three different blocks in a blocks world similar to the worlds known from the classic AI literature. The Neurosolver records the observed trajectories in the state space of the blocks world and uses the learned traces to perform searches and construct plans to control the movements of the blocks. This work is a part of a broader effort to devise neurally-based agents that would cooperate en masse in a process of solving complex problems. We consider it a next step toward a Neuromorphic General Problem Solver.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.026

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of International Conference on Neural Networks (ICNN'96)Same topicEvolutionary Algorithms and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207