MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2160407365 · doi:10.1080/00949655.2014.993637

Exact likelihood-based point and interval estimation for Laplace distribution based on Type-II right censored samples

2014· article· en· W2160407365 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Statistical Computation and Simulation · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicStatistical Distribution Estimation and Applications
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsMathematicsEstimatorStatisticsInterval estimationMoment (physics)Monte Carlo methodPoint estimationConfidence intervalLaplace distributionLaplace's methodLaplace transformScale parameterCoverage probabilityApplied mathematicsExponential distributionBayesian probabilityMathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we first present explicit expressions for the maximum likelihood estimators (MLEs) of the location and scale parameters of the Laplace distribution based on a Type-II right censored sample under different cases. Next, we derive the joint moment generating function of the MLEs of the two parameters and use it to obtain the bias and mean squared error of the MLEs for all the cases. We then derive the exact density functions of the MLEs and utilize them to develop exact confidence intervals for the parameters. Next, a Monte Carlo simulation study is carried out to evaluate the performance of the developed inferential results. Finally, some examples are presented to illustrate the point and interval estimation methods.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.761
Threshold uncertainty score0.565

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.363
Teacher spread0.325 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it