MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2160407365 · doi:10.1080/00949655.2014.993637

Exact likelihood-based point and interval estimation for Laplace distribution based on Type-II right censored samples

2014· article· en· W2160407365 on OpenAlexafffund
N. Balakrishnan, Xiaojun Zhu

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Statistical Computation and Simulation · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicStatistical Distribution Estimation and Applications
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsMathematicsEstimatorStatisticsInterval estimationMoment (physics)Monte Carlo methodPoint estimationConfidence intervalLaplace distributionLaplace's methodLaplace transformScale parameterCoverage probabilityApplied mathematicsExponential distributionBayesian probabilityMathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we first present explicit expressions for the maximum likelihood estimators (MLEs) of the location and scale parameters of the Laplace distribution based on a Type-II right censored sample under different cases. Next, we derive the joint moment generating function of the MLEs of the two parameters and use it to obtain the bias and mean squared error of the MLEs for all the cases. We then derive the exact density functions of the MLEs and utilize them to develop exact confidence intervals for the parameters. Next, a Monte Carlo simulation study is carried out to evaluate the performance of the developed inferential results. Finally, some examples are presented to illustrate the point and interval estimation methods.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.010
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.063
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.053

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0100.063
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.004
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.363
Teacher spread0.325 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Statistical Computation and SimulationSame topicStatistical Distribution Estimation and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207