MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2160604664 · doi:10.1109/tac.2008.2009675

Actuator Fault Detection and Isolation for a Network of Unmanned Vehicles

2009· article· en· W2160604664 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Automatic Control · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFault Detection and Control Systems
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsActuatorFault detection and isolationResidualFault (geology)EngineeringControl engineeringIsolation (microbiology)Computer scienceControl theory (sociology)Real-time computingControl (management)AlgorithmArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This technical note investigates development, design and analysis of actuator fault detection and isolation (FDI) filters for a network of unmanned vehicles. It is shown that actuator fault signatures in a network of unmanned vehicles are dependent and the network can be considered as an over-actuated system. An isolability index mu is defined for a family of fault signatures and a new structured residual set is developed that is selectively capable of properly detecting and isolating mu multiple faults in linear systems with dependent fault signatures, such as over-actuated systems. Our proposed algorithm is then applied to the actuator FDI problem in a network of unmanned vehicles configured according to centralized, decentralized and semi-decentralized architectures. A comparative analysis in terms of the capabilities and limitations of these architectures is performed. Simulation results presented for the formation flight of multiple satellites demonstrate the effectiveness of our proposed FDI algorithm.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.834
Threshold uncertainty score0.604

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it