Conceptualizing Mediatization: Contexts, Traditions, Arguments
Why is this work in the frame?
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame — the usual design — would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.
Abstract
Why “mediatization” as a topic for communication theory now? This rather ungainly word has been rising in prominence for the past decade, but many readers of this journal may still want to ask: What does it mean? What does it add to communications theory? And is it necessary at all? The purpose of this introduction to the special issue—apart from introducing and summarizing the articles that follow—is to provide some context for the emergence of “mediatization” as a key theoretical concept for contemporary media and communications research, and to offer some reasons why it now deserves the full attention of scholars of communication theory. The word “mediatization” does indeed strike an odd note to the ears of native English speakers, provoking the immediate reaction: Why is such an awkward formulation needed? But we are long past the point in communications research when the instincts of native English speakers should have priority! A fully institutionalized field of communications research has a pressing need for common terms that can orientate researchers from many countries and geolinguistic regions toward shared problems and areas of inquiry. As Sonia Livingstone (2009) explained in her ICA Presidential address in Montreal in 2008, “mediatization”—or in German: Mediatisierung—is a term with a long and respectable history in German-speaking countries. More important, it has emerged as the most likely “winner” in a race between many terms, all cumbersome or ambiguous to varying degrees—mediazation, medialization, mediation—that have been coined to capture somehow the broad consequences for everyday life and practical organization (social, political, cultural, economic) of media, and more particularly of the pervasive spread of media contents and platforms through all types of context and practice. Put simply, something is going on with media in our lives, and it is deep enough not to be reached simply by accumulating more and more specific studies that analyze this newspaper, describe how that program was produced, or trace how particular audiences make sense of that film on a particular occasion.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
The record
- Venue
- Communication Theory
- Topic
- Media Studies and Communication
- Field
- Social Sciences
- Canadian institutions
- —
- Funders
- —
- Keywords
- EpistemologySociologyAestheticsEnvironmental ethicsPhilosophy
- Has abstract in OpenAlex
- yes