Elastic properties of large‐open‐mesh 2D braided composites: Model predictions and initial experimental findings
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Conventional applications of two‐dimensional tubular braided composites mostly require closed‐mesh braiding; however, some stiffness‐critical applications may require use of open‐mesh braiding. Most likely candidates for the open‐mesh braided composites are in the medical field, such as braided catheters and stents. Analytical and experimental investigation of the open‐mesh braided tubular composites is very limited in the open literature; therefore, this study is an initial attempt to close this gap. The article investigates elastic properties of the open‐mesh braided composites (e.g., braided catheters) and open‐mesh composites with holes (i.e., stent‐like structures). Analytical results are also compared with that of experimental results. Findings may be used in design of braided medical tubular composites. POLYM. COMPOS., 31:2017–2024, 2010. © 2010 Society of Plastics Engineers
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it