MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2160757964 · doi:10.2337/diaspect.17.3.156

Hypothesis 4. Depression is associated with other physical precipitants of heart disease.

2004· article· en· W2160757964 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Robert M. Carney

Bibliographic record

VenueDiabetes Spectrum · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicPain Management and Placebo Effect
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineMyocardial infarctionDepression (economics)Internal medicineUnstable anginaC-reactive proteinCardiologyAcute coronary syndromePathophysiologyAnginaAcute-phase proteinRisk factorInterleukin 6Inflammation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Lesperance F, Frasure-Smith N, Theroux P, Irwin M: The association between major depression and levels of soluble intercellular adhesion molecule 1, interleukin-6, and C-reactive protein in patients with recent acute coronary syndromes. Am J Psychiatry 161:271–277, 2004 Investigators are avidly seeking pathophysiological (or biological) links between depression and coronary heart disease (CHD). Such data would further the status of depression as a modifiable CHD risk factor. In this study, Lesperance et al. determined whether depressed patients with established CHD have higher levels of inflammatory markers following an acute coronary event when judged against comparable nondepressed patients. The development of thrombi from an atherosclerotic plaque leads to a release of cytokines (including interleukin-6 [IL-6]), elevation of serum proteins known as acute-phase reactants (such as C-reactive protein), and the expression and endothelial shedding of soluble intercellular adhesion molecules (such as sICAM-1). These markers tend to be elevated following an acute coronary event, and higher levels predict a worse prognosis.36 The authors wondered whether depression further elevates these markers in patients with recent acute coronary syndromes, thereby increasing the risk for subsequent cardiac events and cardiac-related mortality. Four hundred eighty-one patients from the Montreal Heart Institute referred for a coronary angiogram following a myocardial infarction (MI) or because of unstable angina were assessed for depression. The patients then provided blood samples for measurement of IL-6, sICAM-1, and C-reactive protein. sICAM-1, but not IL-6 or C-reactive protein, was found to differ between depressed and nondepressed patients. The results suggested to the authors that, in patients with a recent acute coronary syndrome, depression is associated with higher degrees of endothelial dysfunction. This relationship remained …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.031
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.025
Threshold uncertainty score0.083

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.031
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.003
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0030.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0250.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDiabetes SpectrumSame topicPain Management and Placebo EffectFrench-language works237,207