MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2160942650 · doi:10.2469/faj.v57.n6.2491

The General Hull–White Model and Supercalibration

2001· article· en· W2160942650 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueFinancial Analysts Journal · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicStochastic processes and financial applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTrinomial treeSwap (finance)EconometricsHeath–Jarrow–Morton frameworkShort rateShort-rate modelCalibrationInterest rate derivativeTrinomialSkewInterest rate swapEconomicsLIBOR market modelVolatility smileEmbedded optionForward rateInterest rateVolatility (finance)Computer scienceYield curveValuation of optionsBinomial options pricing modelMathematicsStatisticsMacroeconomicsFinance

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Term-structure models are widely used to price interest rate derivatives, such as swap options and bonds with embedded options. We describe how a general one-factor model of the short rate can be implemented as a recombining trinomial tree and calibrated to market prices of actively traded instruments. The general model encompasses most popular one-factor Markov models as special cases. The implementation and the calibration procedures are sufficiently general that they can select the functional form of the model that best fits the market prices. This characteristic allows the model to fit the prices of in- and out-of-the-money options when there is a volatility skew. It also allows the model to work well with economies characterized by very low interest rates, such as Japan, for which other models often fail.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.875
Threshold uncertainty score0.734

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it