MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

The future of production systems in a globalized world

2007· review· en· W2160991483 on OpenAlexaff
Elena M. Bennett, Patricia Balvanera

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Ecology and the Environment · 2007
Typereview
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicLand Use and Ecosystem Services
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEcosystem servicesProvisioningEcosystemMillennium Ecosystem AssessmentPsychological resilienceGeographyResilience (materials science)Environmental resource managementProduction (economics)BusinessEcologyEnvironmental scienceEconomicsBiologyEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Human life is ultimately dependent on ecosystem services supplied by the biosphere. These include food, disease regulation, and recreational opportunities. Over the past 50 years, humans have changed ecosystems more rapidly and extensively than at any other time in human history, primarily to meet our growing demands for provisioning ecosystem services (eg food, freshwater, and timber). These changes have impacted other ecosystem services (eg climate regulation and erosion control). Current demand for ecosystem services is growing rapidly. How these demands are met will play a major role in determining the ecological, economic, and cultural future of the planet. While much is known about improving management of production systems to be more sustainable, research gaps remain. Challenges for ecologists include understanding the connection between management regimes, ecosystem structures and provision of multiple types of ecosystem services, understanding interactions among ecosystem services, and exploring the role of thresholds and resilience in production systems. Understanding these systems and how to manage them to ensure resilient provision of multiple ecosystem services is a key challenge for ecology. La vida humana depende en última instancia de los servicios ecosistémicos que proporciona la biosfera. Éstos incluyen alimento, control de enfermedades y oportunidades recreativas. En los últimos 50 anños los humanos han alterado los ecosistemas mas rápida y extensamente que durante cualquier otro periodo de la historia, principalmente para satisfacer la creciente demanda de servicios de aprovisionamiento (e.g., alimento, agua potable y madera). Estos cambios han alterado a otros servicios de los ecosistemas (e.g., regulación del clima y control de erosión). La demanda de servicios de los ecosistemas está creciendo rápidamente. La manera como esta demanda sea cubierta determinará el futuro ecológico, económico y cultural del planeta. Aunque se conocen maneras de mejorar los sistemas de producción para hacerlos sostenibles, aún existen muchos vacíos en la investigación. Los retos para los ecólogos incluyen el poder entender la conexión entre diferentes regímenes de manejo, las estructuras de los ecosistemas y la dotación de diversos tipos de servicios del ecosistema, la exploración de los umbrales y la resiliencia de los sistemas de producción. La comprensión de estos sistemas y su manejo para asegurar la resiliencia en la dotación de múltiples servicios ecosistémicos es un reto clave para la ecología.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.024
Threshold uncertainty score0.081

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.003
Scholarly communication0.0080.009
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0240.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations186
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in Ecology and the EnvironmentSame topicLand Use and Ecosystem ServicesFrench-language works237,207