A hybrid evolutionary programming method for circuit optimization
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A hybrid evolutionary programming (EP) method is presented for global optimization of complex circuits. The conventional EP is integrated with a clustering algorithm to improve the robustness of the algorithm for complex multimodal circuit optimization problems. The EP generates populations around the regions of the search space which can potentially contain a minimum but may be overlooked. The clustering algorithm is used to identify these regions dynamically. In order to improve the speed of optimization, the EP is combined with a gradient-based search method in an efficient fashion. The local search is performed from the center of each identified cluster in order to find the minimum in the region very fast. The hybrid algorithm can also reduce the search space by avoiding the search in the areas that were previously investigated. This feature greatly improves the speed of optimization and prevents the premature convergence as well. The algorithm performed very well in several benchmark problems including a test function minimization and global optimization of a complex RF diplexer circuit.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it