MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2161706971 · doi:10.1080/14634980490281236

Benthic algae as bioindicators of agricultural pollution in the streams and rivers of southern Québec (Canada)

2004· article· en· W2161706971 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Isabelle Lavoie, Warwick F. Vincent, Reinhard Pienitz, Jean Painchaud

Bibliographic record

VenueAquatic Ecosystem Health & Management · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicDiatoms and Algae Research
Canadian institutionsMinistère des TransportsUniversité Laval
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMinisterio del Ambiente, Agua y Transición Ecológica
KeywordsPeriphytonBioindicatorBenthic zoneEnvironmental scienceOrdinationAlgaeBiomass (ecology)STREAMSWater qualityCommunity structureDiatomEcologyCanonical correspondence analysisPollutionNutrientAbundance (ecology)Biology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of agricultural pollution on periphyton in streams and rivers of southern Québec. We sampled benthic algae incubated from mid-July to mid-August on artificial substrates at 29 sites and analysed the variations in community structure and total community biomass. Diatom community structure as well as total benthic algae community were analysed. Water samples were taken to provide background chemical information, and land use data were also obtained. Preliminary tests showed that colonisation of the artificial substrates (unglazed ceramic tiles) resulted in biomass levels (Chlorophyll a and ash-free dry weight) and species composition that were not statistically different from those on natural rock substrates. The canonical correspondence analyses showed that pH, conductivity and suspended solids were the most significant environmental variables accounting for variations among sites and diatom community structure. No additional resolving power was obtained by including cyanobacteria, green algae and flagellates. This total community analysis substantially increased variance and sample processing time while reducing the relationship with environmental variables. These results indicate that an analysis based exclusively on diatoms provided the optimal approach. Traditional nutrient measurements (phosphorus and nitrogen) did not explain a significant part of the variance in the species composition among sites. The ordination analyses clearly separated agriculturally-impacted streams from reference sites, but no significant grouping was observed related to the intensity and type of agriculture, indicating the greater importance of local farming practices. The use of periphyton as a bioindicator provides an integrated measurement of water quality as experienced by the aquatic biota, and therefore offers a useful addition to physico-chemical water quality monitoring strategies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.033
Threshold uncertainty score0.066

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations45
Published2004
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAquatic Ecosystem Health & ManagementSame topicDiatoms and Algae ResearchFrench-language works237,207