Mapping Territories and Creating Nomadic Pathways with Multiple Literacies Theory
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This article foregrounds Multiple Literacies Theory (MLT) positioned from a deleuzianguattarian perspective. It is a literacy paradigm different from prevailing territories such as New Literacy Studies and Multiliteracies. MLT deterrritorializes familiar literacy theorizing and is a complementary theoretical experiment to those conducted by curriculum theorists working with poststructuralist perspectives and complexity theory. It accompanies a deleuzianguattarian philosophy as a nonphilosophy for thinking about problems that present themselves in the world. In this case, we deploy MLT to create nomadic pathways as we consider vignettes from a research study on a child acquiring multiple writing systems simultaneously. The vignettes illustrate what literacies produce and how they function through the lens of MLT. MLT proposes that from the effect of investment in reading, reading the world, and self, a reader is formed and transformed in a process of becoming Other.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it