Analysis of a novel preconditioner for a class of <i>p</i>‐level lower rank extracted systems
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract This paper proposes and studies the performance of a preconditioner suitable for solving a class of symmetric positive definite systems, Âx = b , which we call p ‐ level lower rank extracted systems ( p ‐ level LRES ), by the preconditioned conjugate gradient method. The study of these systems is motivated by the numerical approximation of integral equations with convolution kernels defined on arbitrary p ‐dimensional domains. This is in contrast to p ‐level Toeplitz systems which only apply to rectangular domains. The coefficient matrix, Â , is a principal submatrix of a p ‐level Toeplitz matrix, A , and the preconditioner for the preconditioned conjugate gradient algorithm is provided in terms of the inverse of a p ‐level circulant matrix constructed from the elements of A . The preconditioner is shown to yield clustering in the spectrum of the preconditioned matrix which leads to a substantial reduction in the computational cost of solving LRE systems. Copyright © 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it