MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2162145032 · doi:10.1016/j.baae.2005.07.006

Has egg location influenced the radiation of Diplolepis (Hymenoptera: Cynipidae) gall wasps on wild roses?

2005· article· en· W2162145032 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueBasic and Applied Ecology · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicHymenoptera taxonomy and phylogeny
Canadian institutionsLaurentian University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Geographic Society
KeywordsHymenopteraGallGall waspBiologyBotanyZoologyHorticulture

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The oviposition sites of 6 species of gall wasps of the genus Diplolepis on their host roses in Ontario, Canada were examined using plant histological techniques. A leaf galler, Diplolepis polita , and a stem galler, D. triforma , gall Rosa acicularis ; whereas the leaf galler D. bicolor and the stem gallers D. nodulosa , D. spinosa and D. fusiformans gall R. blanda. D. polita and D. bicolor deposit their eggs on developing leaflets within leaf buds. D. nodulosa , D. triforma , and D. spinosa deposit their eggs between the leaf primordia near the apical meristem of leaf buds. D. fusiformans deposits eggs on the surface of current-year stems. We consider leaf buds as adaptive zones. The precise deposition of eggs within these organs contributes to species-specific differences in gall structure, and may have influenced radiation of the genus. Inquilines and parasitoids are not deterred by differences in gall structure, and thus it appears that enemies are not driving forces in the radiation of these cynipids.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.891
Threshold uncertainty score0.234

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.199
Teacher spread0.184 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it