SpADe: On Shape-based Pattern Detection in Streaming Time Series
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Monitoring predefined patterns in streaming time series is useful to applications such as trend-related analysis, sensor networks and video surveillance. Most current studies on such monitoring employ Euclidean distance to calculate the similarities between given query patterns and subsequences of streaming time series. Euclidean distance has been shown to be ineffective in measuring distances of time series in which shifting and scaling usually exist. Consequently, warping distances such as dynamic time warping (DTW), longest common subsequence (LCSS), have been proposed to handle warps in temporal dimension. However, they are inadequate in handling shifting and scaling in amplitude dimension. Moreover, they have been designed mainly for full sequence matching, whereas in online monitoring applications, we typically have no knowledge on the positions and lengths of possible matching subsequences. In this paper, we first discuss the weaknesses of existing warping distances on detecting patterns from streaming time series. We then propose a novel warping distance, which we name Spatial Assembling Distance (SpADe), that is able to handle shifting and scaling in both temporal and amplitude dimensions. We further propose an efficient approach for continuous pattern detection using SpADe, that is fundamental for subsequence matching on streaming data. Finally, our experimental results show that SpADe is effective and efficient for continuous pattern detection in streaming time series.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".