Robust Spatial-Domain Based Super-Resolution Mosaicing of CubeSat Video Frames: Algorithm and Evaluation
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper, a spatial domain based super-resolution mosaicing system and its evaluation results are presented. This algorithm incorporates two main algorithms, an image mosaicing algorithm and a super-resolution-reconstruction algorithm. Huber-based prior information is used to address the ill-posed nature of the super resolution problem. To test the efficiency of the proposed algorithm, four performance metrics are used: mean square error, peak signal-to-noise ratio, singular value decomposition based measure, and cumulative probability of blur detection. Testing is performed using datasets generated from both a high altitude balloon and an Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV). Results show that the proposed algorithm is highly efficient in real-time applications, such as remote sensing on a small satellite (i.e., CubeSat.) Furthermore, the performance metrics are proven to be accurate in quantitative evaluation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.010 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it