Minimizing Nonconvex Functions for Sparse Vector Reconstruction
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper, we develop a novel methodology for minimizing a class of nonconvex (concave on the non-negative orthant) functions for solving an underdetermined linear system of equations As =xwhen the solution vectorsis knowna priorito be sparse. The proposed technique is based on locally replacing the original objective function by a quadratic convex function which is easily minimized. The resulting algorithm is iterative and is absolutely converging to a fixed point of the original objective function. For a certain selection of convex objective functions, the class of algorithms called iterative reweighted least squares (IRLS) is shown to be a special case of the proposed methodology. Thus, the proposed algorithms are a generalization and unification of the previous methods. In addition, we also propose a new class of algorithms with better convergence properties compared to the regular IRLS algorithms and, hence, can be considered as enhancements to these algorithms. Since the original objective functions are nonconvex, the proposed algorithm is susceptible to convergence to a local minimum. To alleviate this difficulty, we propose a random perturbation technique that enhances the performance of the proposed algorithm. The numerical results show that the proposed algorithms outperform some of the well-known algorithms that are usually utilized for solving the same problem.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".