MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2163293561 · doi:10.1109/tsp.2010.2046900

Minimizing Nonconvex Functions for Sparse Vector Reconstruction

2010· article· en· W2163293561 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Signal Processing · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSparse and Compressive Sensing Techniques
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUnderdetermined systemOrthantAlgorithmIterative methodMathematicsConvex functionConvergence (economics)Mathematical optimizationComputer scienceFunction (biology)Regular polygonApplied mathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we develop a novel methodology for minimizing a class of nonconvex (concave on the non-negative orthant) functions for solving an underdetermined linear system of equations As = <i xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">x</i> when the solution vector <i xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">s</i> is known <i xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">a priori</i> to be sparse. The proposed technique is based on locally replacing the original objective function by a quadratic convex function which is easily minimized. The resulting algorithm is iterative and is absolutely converging to a fixed point of the original objective function. For a certain selection of convex objective functions, the class of algorithms called iterative reweighted least squares (IRLS) is shown to be a special case of the proposed methodology. Thus, the proposed algorithms are a generalization and unification of the previous methods. In addition, we also propose a new class of algorithms with better convergence properties compared to the regular IRLS algorithms and, hence, can be considered as enhancements to these algorithms. Since the original objective functions are nonconvex, the proposed algorithm is susceptible to convergence to a local minimum. To alleviate this difficulty, we propose a random perturbation technique that enhances the performance of the proposed algorithm. The numerical results show that the proposed algorithms outperform some of the well-known algorithms that are usually utilized for solving the same problem.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.924
Threshold uncertainty score0.888

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it