Optimal Scheduling Policy Determination for High Speed Downlink Packet Access
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper, we present an analytic model and methodology to determine optimal scheduling policy that involves two dimension space allocation: time and code, in high speed downlink packet access (HSDPA) system. A discrete stochastic dynamic programming model for the HSDPA downlink scheduler is presented. Value iteration is then used to solve for optimal policy. This framework is used to find the optimal scheduling policy for the case of two users sharing the same cell. Simulation is used to study the performance of the resulted optimal policy using round robin (RR) scheduler as a baseline. The policy granularity is introduced to reduce the computational complexity by reducing the action space. The results showed that finer granularity (down to 5 codes) enhances the performance significantly. However, the enhancement gained when using even finer granularity was marginal and does not justify the added complexity. The behaviour of the value function was observed to characterize the optimal scheduling policy. These observations is then used to develop a heuristic scheduling policy. The devised heuristic policy has much less computational complexity which makes it easy to deploy and with only slight reduction in performance compared to the optimal policy according to the simulation results.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".